THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte WILLIAM P. ENLOW
_____________
Appeal No. 95-3536
Application 08/038,4001
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, WEIFFENBACH and WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.
WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner refusing
to allow claims 3, 5, 12-17, 19 and 20 which are the only claims remaining in the application. We 2
reverse.
1Application for patent filed March 29, 1993.
2Appellants’ brief included claim 18. The examiner correctly noted that claim 18 had been
canceled by appellant in an amendment after final (paper no. 10) which had been entered pursuant
to appellant’s appeal (see advisory action, paper no. 11).
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007