THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROBERT C.U. YU and RICHARD L. POST
____________
Appeal No. 95-3749
Application No. 07/953,6191
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KIMLIN, PAK and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s refusal
to allow claims 2, 3, 6 through 13, 21, 23 and 25 through 30,
which are all of the claims remaining in the application. Claims
3, 6 through 13, 21 and 26 were amended subsequent to final
rejection.
Claims 21 and 26 are representative of the subject matter on
appeal and read as follows:
1Application for patent filed September 30, 1992.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007