THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 11
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte GEOFFREY D. BROWN, MICHAEL J.
KEOGH, SARI B. SAMUELS
and JEFFREY M. COGEN
_____________
Appeal No. 95-3782
Application 08/048,3711
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before SOFOCLEOUS, HANLON and WALTZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 11. Claims 17
and 18 are the only other claims remaining in this application
1 Application for patent filed April 15, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007