Appeal No. 95-3834 Application No. 07/947,569 However, a closer reading of Cairns reveals that (col. 3, lines 40-47): The first filler material [e.g., titanium oxide], . . . provides an anchor for the transfer film of lubricating polytetrafluoroethylene. This holds the lubricant to make maximum use of those properties which result in an improvement in wear and low friction. Compare appellant’s specification, p. 2 (“The granulated alloy material is peened and burnished to the bearing surfaces, thereby entwining and embedding the granules of PTFE within a matrix formed thereby.”); see also claim 9. Therefore, we agree with appellant that nothing in the Cairns reference teaches, suggests or motivates one of ordinary skill in the art to add a metal alloy material to the dry lubricant powders disclosed in McCready. See In re Gorman, 933 F.2d 982, 987, 18 USPQ2d 1885, 1888 (Fed. Cir. 1991) (in a determination under 35 U.S.C. § 103 it is impermissible to simply engage in a hindsight reconstruction of the claimed invention, using the applicant’s structure as a template and selecting elements from references to fill the gaps; the references themselves must provide some teaching 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007