THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 35
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte RONALD P. REITZ
__________
Appeal No. 95-3835
Application 08/107,0471
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before METZ, OWENS and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-7 and 20-32, which
are all of the claims remaining in the application.
1Application for patent filed August 17, 1993. According to the appellant, the
application is a continuation of Application 07/810,545, filed December 19, 1991,
abandoned; which is a continuation of Application 07/593,149, filed October 5, 1990,
abandoned; and which is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/405,178, filed
September 11, 1989, now Patent No. 5,194,181, issued March 16, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007