THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 34
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte RICHARD MILNER
__________
Appeal No. 95-3875
Application 08/049,6131
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before WEIFFENBACH, PAK and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 2, 4-7, 18 and
20-22, which are all of the claims remaining in the application.
1Application for patent filed April 16, 1993. According to the appellant, the
application is a continuation of Application 07/659,395, filed February 21, 1991,
abandoned, which is a national stage application under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of
PCT/GB89/00978, filed August 23, 1989.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007