Appeal No. 95-4119 Application 08/155,877 The following rejections are before us for review.3 Claims 4, 6, 7 and 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Oil in view of Aktiebolaget. Claims 4, 6, 7 and 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Wuerfel in view of Oil and Aktiebolaget. The full text of the examiner's rejections and response to the argument presented by appellant appears in the answer (Paper No. 10), while the complete statement of appellant’s argument can be found in the brief (Paper No. 9). OPINION In reaching our conclusion on the obviousness issues raised in this appeal, this panel of the board has carefully considered appellant’s specification and claims, the applied teachings, and the respective viewpoints of appellant and the4 3A final rejection of appellant’s claims under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, was withdrawn by the examiner (answer, page 2). 4In our evaluation of the applied teachings, we have considered all of the disclosure of each teaching for what it 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007