Ex parte BODIN et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
               This opinion (1) was not written for publication and                   
               (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                             
                                                               Paper No. 17           
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    ____________                                      
                   Ex parte WILLIAM K. BODIN and DALE R. WHITFIELD                    
                                    ____________                                      
                                 Appeal No. 95-4172                                   
                               Application 08/040,6981                                
                                    ____________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    ____________                                      
          Before THOMAS, LEE, and TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges.              
          TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final                 
          rejection of claims 1-3 and 8, the only pending claims.  We                 
          reverse.                                                                    
               The subject matter of the invention is a system and                    
          method for simultaneous high-resolution display for multiple                
          virtual applications.  Claim 8 is representative of the claims              
          on appeal, which stand or fall together (emphasis added):                   

               1    Attorney docket no. BC9-93-008.                                   





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007