THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 38
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte ROBERT I. RUDKO
________________
Appeal No. 95-4246
Application 08/201,0521
________________
HEARD: SEPTEMBER 17, 1997
________________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, STAAB
and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed February 24, 1994.
According to appellant, the application is a continuation of
Application 08/014,363, filed February 5, 1993, now abandoned,
which is a continuation of Application 07/928,531, filed
August 13, 1992, now abandoned, which is a continuation of
Application 07/586,891, filed September 24, 1990, now
abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007