THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MICHAEL G. R. ZOBEL
____________
Appeal No. 95-4359
Application No. 08/041,1901
____________
HEARD: January 15, 1998
____________
Before McQUADE, NASE, and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 2, 3, 5, 6 and 9 through 12, which are all of
the claims pending in this application.2
1Application for patent filed April 1, 1993. According to
the appellant, the application is a continuation of Application
No. 07/623,675, filed December 6, 1990, now abandoned, which was
a continuation of Application No. 07/377,071, filed July 10,
1989, now abandoned.
2Claim 5 has been amended subsequent to the final rejection
by an amendment filed on September 30, 1994 (Paper No. 12).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007