THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ARTHUR P. D’SILVA and
EDWARD J. JASELSKIS
_____________
Appeal No. 95-4369
Application 08/117,2421
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before BARRETT, LEE AND CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
final rejection of claims 45, 46, 48-57, 64-74, 81 and 83-84.
Claims 1-44, 47, 58-63, 75-80 and 82 have been canceled (Br. at
1). No claim has been allowed.
1Application for patent filed September 3, 1993.
According to appellants, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/770,524, filed October 3, 1991, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007