THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 50
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte EDWIN P. BEIERLORZER
________________
Appeal No. 95-4375
Application 08/153,4911
________________
HEARD: MARCH 4, 1998
________________
Before McCandlish, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, Meister
and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision in an appeal from the final rejection of
claims 18-25 and 28-36, all the claims in the application. 2
1Application for patent filed November 17, 1993.
According to appellant, the application is a continuation of
Application 07/861,225, filed March 31, 1992, now abandoned.
2Although the record indicates that the amendment filed
concurrently with appellant’s main brief (Paper No. 30) has been
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007