THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a
law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte YUKIO SHIMAZAKI, MIYUKI KAWASHIMA,
MASHAIKO ISHIBASHI, RYO TANAKA,
KIYOSHI SAKAI and HISAHIRO ISHIWARI
__________
Appeal No. 95-4691
Application 08/021,6521
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before KIMLIN, WEIFFENBACH and ELLIS, Administrative Patent Judges.
WEIFFENBACH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims
1-17, which are all of the claims in the application. We affirm.
Application for patent filed February 22, 1993. According to appellants the application is a continuation of1
Application 07/580,913, filed September 12, 1990, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007