Ex parte BARNETT et al. - Page 1






                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                       
               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                    
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                      
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the                         
               Board.                                                                  
                                                             Paper No. 17              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                    _____________                                      

                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    _____________                                      

                  Ex parte CHARLES J. BARNETT and THOMAS M. WILSON                     
                                    _____________                                      
                                  Appeal No. 95-4803                                   
                               Application 08/096,0991                                 
                                    ______________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                     

          Before:  WINTERS and WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent                 
          Judges, and McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.                    

          McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.                                

                       Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                        



             Application for patent filed July 23, 1993.  The real party in interest appears1                                                                        
          to be Eli Lilly and Company.                                                 





Page:  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007