Ex parte AMINI et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 95-4913                                                          
          Application No. 07/962,425                                                  


               As indicated by the title, the disclosed invention relates             
          to a method and system for reduced metastability between devices            
          which communicate and operate at different clock frequencies.               
               Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it               
          reads as follows:                                                           
               1.  A method in a data processing system having a first                
          clock operating at a first clock rate and a second clock                    
          operating at a second clock rate for improving communication                
          between a first device associated with said first clock rate and            
          a second device associated with said second clock rate, said                
          method comprising within said data processing system the steps              
          of:                                                                         
               determining particular periods of time during which                    
          metastability may occur as a result of data being transmitted               
          from said first device at said first clock rate and received by             
          said second device at said second clock rate;                               
               continually processing said data by double latching said               
          data transmitted from said first device to said second device;              
               during said particular periods of time, inputting said                 
          processed data into said second device; and                                 
               during all other periods of time, inputting said data                  
          directly into said second device.                                           
               The references relied on by the examiner are:                          
          Heckel                        4,176,400           Nov.  27, 1979            
          Flemming                      4,405,898           Sep.  20, 1983            
          Azevedo et al. (Azevedo)      4,868,514           Sep.  19, 1989            
               Claims 1, 3 through 6 and 8 through 10 stand rejected under            
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the admitted prior art           
          (specification, pages 2 and 3) in view of Flemming and Heckel.              

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007