Appeal No. 95-4918
Application No. 08/114,293
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 2
through 22 and 24, and from the refusal of the examiner to
allow
claim 23, as amended subsequent to the final rejection. These
claims constitute all of the claims remaining in the
application.
Appellants’ invention pertains to a device, and process
for damping the motion sequences of two masses. An
understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading
of exemplary claims 13, 19 and 21, copies of which appear in
the corrected APPENDIX communication of Paper No. 39.
As evidence of obviousness, the examiner has applied the
documents listed below:
Fujishiro et al. 4,696,489 Sep. 29,
1987
(Fujishiro)
Wolfe 4,953,089 Aug. 28,
1990
Ivers et al. 5,004,079 Apr. 2,
1991
(Ivers)
The following rejection, as set forth in the answer
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007