THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 12
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ERNST ORTHMANN, KLAUS WULFF, PETER HOELTZENBEIN,
HELMUT JUDAT, HANS WAGNER, GOTTFRIED ZABY and
HERBERT HEIDINGSFELD
____________
Appeal No. 95-4985
Application No. 08/164,2271
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before CAROFF, PAK and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1 through 12, all of the claims pending in
the application.
1Application for patent filed December 7, 1993.
According to the appellants, the application is a
continuation-in-part of Application No. 08/008,957, filed
January 26, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007