THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte HORST FROESSL
____________
Appeal No. 95-5009
Application 08/162,3671
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, TORCZON and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of Claims
11-86, which constitute all the claims remaining in the
application.
Application for patent filed December 7, 1993. According1
to appellant, this application is a continuation of Application
07/783,212 filed October 28, 1991, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007