THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 10
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte WILLIAM H. WAYMAN and RASIN MOSER
____________
Appeal No. 95-5098
Application 08/169,8361
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims
21, 22, 25, and 26. The other claims remaining in the
application are claims 17, 20, 23, 24, 27, and 28, which have
been indicated as allowable.
Claim 21 reads as follows:
Application for patent filed December 16, 1993.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007