Ex parte TERRY et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-0215                                                          
          Application 07/975,908                                                      


               The invention relates to an optical feature extractor for              
          symbolically encoding DNA bases to permit detection of a class of           
          DNA sequences based on their symmetry.                                      
               The independent claim 10 is reproduced as follows:                     
               10.   An optical feature extraction apparatus for detecting            
          data comprising:                                                            
                    a filter for decoding the data to be detected                     
                    comprising a plurality of opaque and transparent                  
                    regions;                                                          
                    a display means for displaying the filter, the                    
                    displayed filter spatially modulating the light                   
                    from the display means and creating an intensity                  
                    distribution of light;                                            
                    a means for replicating the light intensity                       
                    distribution received from the display means;                     
                    a mask encoded with the data to be                                
                    classified, the mask receiving and further                        
                    modulating the light intensity distribution;                      
                    and                                                               
                    a means for detecting the further modulated light                 
                    intensity distribution received from the mask.                    
               The Examiner relies on the following references:                       
          Shelton, Jr.                  3,064,519      Nov. 20, 1962                  
          Tsujiuchi et al. (Tsujiuchi) 5,148,502       Sep. 15, 1992                  
               Claims 2 through 5 and 10 through 17 stand rejected under 35           
          U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, for failing to particularly point           
          out and distinctly claim the subject matter which Appellants                
          regard as their invention.  Claims 10 through 17 stand rejected             

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007