THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MEHRALI PARKHIDEH
____________
Appeal No. 96-0312
Application No. 08/083,5611
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING and TORCZON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 15. In an Amendment After Final (paper number 12),
claim 9 was amended.2
1Application for patent filed June 30, 1993.
2According to the examiner (paper number 13), the
amendment had the effect of overcoming the rejection of claim
9 under the second paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007