Ex parte IZQUIERDO et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-1152                                                          
          Application 08/001,091                                                      



                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner’s              
          final rejection of claims 1 to 10, which constitute all the                 
          claims in the application.                                                  
               Representative claim 1 is reproduced below:                            
               1.  A method operable by an electronic device for selecting            
          one of a plurality of devices each having a data width and which            
          are addressed using a first number of address lines, wherein each           
          of the devices is coupled to a data bus having a data width, and            
          wherein the data width of each device is less than or equal to              
          the data bus width, the method comprising:                                  
               decoding said first number of address lines to produce a               
          plurality of signals each representing selection of a different             
          one of the devices;                                                         
               encoding said plurality of selection representing signals              
          into a set of addressing signals having an encoded value wherein            
          each encoded value represents a different one of the devices and            
          the number of signals in said set is less than said first number;           
               decoding said encoded set of addressing signals to produce a           
          signal representing selection of one of the devices; and                    
               selecting the device using said selection signal.                      
               The following reference is relied on by the examiner:                  
          Baker et al. (Baker)          5,119,292           June 2, 1992              
                                                  (filed July 21, 1989)               






                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007