Ex parte PERMUT - Page 1




                                                       Paper No. 17                   

               THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                           
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                   _______________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                   _______________                                    
                              Ex parte RONALD M. PERMUT                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 96-1183                                   
                              Application 08/102,8581                                 
                                   _______________                                    
                                   ON BRIEF                                           
                                   _______________                                    
          Before JERRY SMITH, LEE, and TORCZON, Administrative Patent                 
          Judges.                                                                     
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   
                                                                                     


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                 
          from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-6, 9-12 and                 
          15.  Claims 7, 8, 13, 14 and 17-20 were indicated as                        

               Application for patent filed August 6, 1993.1                                                                     
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007