Ex parte HENZE - Page 3




          Appeal No. 96-1209                                                          
          Application 08/168,805                                                      


          mutually orthogonal axes x, y, and z and to resolve the                     
          measurement into respective vectors a , a , and a ;x  y       z                           
               computational means for deriving a net acceleration a  of              
                                                                    net               
          the disk drive from the vectors a , a , and a ;x  y       z                               
               evaluation means for comparing the net acceleration anet               
          with a selected acceleration threshold level indicative of a                
          falling disk drive and for outputting a first signal when the               
          net acceleration a  exceeds the threshold level;                            
                            net                                                       
               timing means for measuring duration of the first signal                
          output by the evaluation means and for outputting a second                  
          signal when the measured duration exceeds a selected reference              
          time period; and                                                            
               control means for preparing, in response to the second                 
          signal output by the timing means, at least one of the storage              
          disk and the actuator arm for a shock induced when the disk                 
          drive impacts a surface at the second elevation.                            

               The examiner relies on the following reference:                        
          Comerford                          5,227,929                July            
          13, 1993                                                                    
               Claims 11 through 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                    
          §§ 102(a) or (e) as anticipated by Comerford.  Claims 1, 2, 4               
          through 10, 15 through 18 and 20 stand rejected under 35                    
          U.S.C.                                                                      
          § 103 as unpatentable over Comerford.                                       
               Reference is made to the brief and answer for the                      
          respective positions of appellant and the examiner.                         

                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007