Ex parte PROFETA - Page 1






                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  
                                                               Paper No. 13           

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                   _______________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                   _______________                                    
                             Ex parte JOSEPH A. PROFETA                               
                                      _________                                       
                                 Appeal No. 96-1290                                   
                               Application  08/042,7191                               
                                   _______________                                    
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    
          Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and BARRETT, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of               
          claims 1 through 34, all the claims pending in the application.             
               The invention pertains to a guided fire control system for a           
          manually aimed gun.                                                         
               Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced as follows:           
               1. A fire control system comprising:                                   
               a manually aimed gun having a sighting device;                         

                                                                                     
          1   Application for patent filed April 5, 1993.                             





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007