Appeal No. 96-1492
Application 07/666,162
of claim 1 and the other claims which are grouped therewith.
Since all of the claims of Group II are dependent claims which
depend
from at least one claim from Group I, we also do not sustain
the rejection of any of the claims of Group II.
In summary, the decision of the examiner rejecting
claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 17-36 is reversed.
REVERSED
STANLEY M. URYNOWICZ, JR. )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
JAMES D. THOMAS ) BOARD OF
PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
JERRY SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007