Ex parte LEVRAN et al. - Page 3




             Appeal No. 96-1560                                                                                       
             Application 08/084,366                                                                                   



                    e.  a storage backup coupled to said DC output for storing energy supplied from                   
                    said DC output and for supplying energy to said DC output when said                               
                    external AC power source is below a predetermined level.                                          

             The examiner relies on the following references:                                                         
             Powell et al. (Powell)             4,719,550                   Jan. 12, 1988                             
             Ertz, III (Ertz)            4,751,398                   June 14, 1988                                    
             Kirchberg, Jr. et al.                                                                                    
             (Kirchberg)                        4,977,492                   Dec. 11, 1990                             

             Claims 26-46 and 48-54 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being                                  
             anticipated by the disclosure of Powell or Ertz.  Claim 47 stands rejected under           35            
             U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the teachings of Powell or Ertz in view                          
             of Kirchberg.                                                                                            
             Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the examiner, we make reference                        
             to the brief and the answer for the respective details thereof.                                          


                                                      OPINION                                                         
             We have carefully considered the subject matter on appeal, the rejections advanced                       
             by the examiner and the evidence of anticipation and obviousness relied upon by the                      
             examiner as support for the rejections.  We have, likewise, reviewed and taken into                      


                                                          3                                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007