Ex parte ARAI - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-1603                                                          
          Application 08/057,989                                                      


          feed screw; a block mounted integrally with the feed nut; a                 
          table supported by the block for movement along an axial                    
          direction of the feed screw; and a slide mechanism disposed                 
          between the block and the table, the slide mechanism being                  
          slidable in at least one of a horizontal direction and a                    
          vertical direction along a plane transverse to the axial                    
          direction of the feed screw.                                                
                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
               The following references were relied on by the examiner                
          to support the rejections:                                                  
          Blatt               4,988,261               Jan. 29, 1991                   
          Kato                5,054,991               Oct.  8, 1991                   
                                  THE REJECTIONS                                      
               Claims 13 and 15-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112,              
          first paragraph because the specification as originally filed,              
          does not provide support for the invention as claimed.                      
               Claims 1, 11 and 15-18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                  
          § 102(b) as being anticipated by Kato.                                      
               Claims 1, 11, 12 and 14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                 
          § 102(b) as being anticipated by Blatt.                                     
               Rather than reiterate the respective positions of the                  
          examiner and the appellant in support of their respective                   
          positions, reference is made to the examiner’s answer (Paper                



                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007