Appeal No. 96-1663 Application 08/046,240 mechanically and electrically in one piece of a homogeneous material" as recited in Appellant's claim 1. Upon a careful review of Scharlau, we find that when read as a whole, Scharlau teaches that Figures 1 and 2 show a multiple short-wave radiator which is made up of a plurality of individual building blocks. These building blocks must be connected by suitable contact means such as the contact means disclosed in Figure 3. Therefore, we find that Scharlau fails to teach all of the limitations of claim 1, and thereby the claim is not anticipated by Scharlau. Claims 2 through 6, 11 through 15 and 19 through 22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Scharlau in view of Watts. Claims 8 through 10, 16 through 18 and 23 through 25 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Scharlau in view of Watts and Kuecken. We note that for these rejections, the Examiner argues that Scharlau teaches that the feed lines form each dipole antenna to a common point and at least one dipole arm in each dipole 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007