Appeal No. 96-1772
Application No. 08/180,648
in independent claim 8 which was not argued by appellants.
Moreover, the range would have been obvious to skilled
artisans, within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. 103, because it
would appear meaningless to have a value less than zero or
greater than the number of instructions in the plurality of
instructions.
The examiner’s decision rejecting claims 8, 12, 15 and 16
under 35 U.S.C. 103 is affirmed.
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007