Ex parte JACOBS - Page 2




            Appeal No. 96-1809                                                                           
            Application 08/094,724                                                                       


            dependent upon rejected independent claim 1 and claims 4-11                                  
            have been allowed by the examiner.                                                           
                  Claim 1 reads as follows:                                                              
                  1.  A method of dispensing a liquid sample onto a test                                 
            element, said element having a test volume subtending a                                      
            surface area for that volume for receiving said sample, the                                  
            method comprising the steps of:                                                              
                  a) applying onto a transfer element having a liquid-                                   
            impermeable surface for supporting a liquid, a quantity of                                   
            liquid sample over substantially all of said supporting                                      
            surface, and                                                                                 
                  b) placing the transfer element liquid-supporting surface                              
            in contact with all of said surface area of a test element at                                
            once, thereby transferring substantially all of the liquid                                   
            sample on said surface of said transfer element as a surface-                                
            dispersed quantity to said test element without the need for                                 
            extensive horizontal flow over said test element surface area.                               


                  The sole issue in this appeal is whether claim 1 was                                   
            properly rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being clearly                                  
            anticipated by Harrison.2                                                                    


                                              Discussion                                                 




                  2     U.S. Patent No. 3,776,184 to Harrison granted December 4, 1973                   
            (hereinafter “Harrison”).                                                                    
                                                    2                                                    





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007