Ex parte CHESKO et al. - Page 3




                 Appeal No. 96-1850                                                                                                                     
                 Application No. 08/218,000                                                                                                             


                          The references relied on by the examiner are:                                                                                 
                 Perkins et al. (Perkins)                                       4,726,657                                    Feb.                       
                 23, 1988                                                                                                                               
                 Mollenhauer et al. (Mollenhauer), “A Compact, Economical, and                                                                          
                 Versatile Moire Interferometer,” Proceedings of the 1993 SEM                                                                           
                 Spring Conference on Experimental Mechanics, Bethel,                                                                                   
                 Connecticut, pp. 954 through 963.2                                                                                                     
                          Claims 1 through 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                                                                       
                 as being unpatentable over Mollenhauer in view of Perkins.                                                                             
                          Reference is made to the brief and the answer for the                                                                         
                 respective positions of the appellants and the examiner.                                                                               
                                                                     OPINION                                                                            
                          We have carefully considered the entire record before us,                                                                     
                 and we will reverse the obviousness rejection of claims 1                                                                              
                 through 9.                                                                                                                             
                          Mollenhauer discloses a moire interferometer mounted on                                                                       
                 an aluminum ring (Figure 2).  Appellants explain                                                                                       
                 (specification, page 5) that a problem with such a moire                                                                               
                 interferometer is that all of the optical elements are exposed                                                                         
                 to the surrounding air, and that the moire interferometer is                                                                           




                          2The citation for this publication was reproduced from                                                                        
                 appellants’ disclosure (specification, page 5).                                                                                        
                                                                           3                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007