THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte JAMES M. ZAVISLAN and JAY M. EASTMAN
__________
Appeal No. 96-1963
Application 08/094,296 1
__________
HEARD: May 5, 1998
__________
Before CALVERT, PATE and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 to 5,
10, 13 to 16, 18, 21, 28 and 30 to 35. Of the other claims in
the application, claims 6 to 9, 11, 12, 17 and 19, 20, 26 and 27
are indicated as allowed and claims 22 to 25 and 29 stand with-
1Application for patent filed July 21, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007