THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte CRAIG OVERHAGE
AND
RICHARD AUSTIN
_____________
Appeal No. 96-1977
Application 08/348,3891
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT, and TORCZON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed December 2, 1994. According
to applicants, the application is a continuation of Application
08/135,099, filed October 12, 1993, now Patent No. 5,446,650.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007