Ex parte PRUITT - Page 3




          Appeal No. 96-1988                                                          
          Application No. 08/172,290                                                  

          Representative independent claim 1 is reproduced as follows:                

                    1.  A method of creating a flowchart using a                      
               programmable computer and a display for said programmable              
               computer, the method comprising the steps of:                          
                    displaying a predetermined set of basic flow forms                
          on a      first area on the display;                                        
                    providing a selection means by which a user can                   
          select    two forms from said set of basic flow forms;                      
                    combining said two selected flow forms to yield a                 
          new       valid flow form according to placement information                
          provided       by the user and a predetermined plurality of                 
          rules, said    rules requiring that one of said two selected                
          flow forms is       placed inside a second of the two selected              
          flow forms or one of said two selected flow forms is placed                 
          in a head-to-tail relationship with the other said second of                
          said two selected flow forms, only downward flow of control                 
          is required within       the said flowchart, and no two lines               
          connecting flow forms    cross one another; and                             
                    displaying the selected flow forms and any new valid              
               flow forms in a second area on said display, wherein any               
               program created from said flowchart is a structured                    
          program.                                                                    
               The examiner relies on the following reference:                        
               Marmelstein              5,187,788                Feb. 16,             
          1993                                                                        
               Claims 1 through 3, 5 through 11 and 13 through 16 stand               
          rejected, under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) and 35 U.S.C. 103, as being                
          anticipated by, or obvious over, Marmelstein, respectively.                 
               Reference is made to the briefs and answers for the                    
          respective positions of appellant and the examiner.                         
                                       OPINION                                        
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007