Ex parte SIMON et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 96-2191                                                          
          Application 08/395,512                                                      


          examiner.  As a consequence of our review, we make the                      
          determination which follows.                                                

               We reverse the rejection of claim 12.  It follows that we              
          likewise reverse the rejection of claims 2, 5 through 11, and               
          13 through 24 since these claims stand or fall with claim 12                
          as earlier indicated.                                                       


               As disclosed (specification, page 6), with the present                 
          invention, microwave transparent, electrically insulating                   
          material is disposed on the exterior of each side wall and on               
          the exterior part of the bottom which would, in the absence of              
          the insulation, contact the floor of the oven.  Appellants                  
          further point out (specification, page 14) that the                         
          electrically-insulating material need not be either microwave-              
          diffusing or microwave-dispersing, “nor is the material                     
          disposed on both the interior and the exterior of the                       
          container of the invention”.                                                

               Claim 12 is drawn to an apparatus in which an object                   




                                          4                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007