Ex parte FITZPATRICK et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-2242                                                          
          Application No. 08/083,242                                                  


               Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it               
          reads as follows:                                                           
               1.  A method of presenting an object in a data processing              
          system, said presentation being with a presentation device,                 
          said data processing system having a user interface that is                 
          separate from said presentation device, comprising the steps                
          of:                                                                         
               a)   displaying a representation of said object on said                
          user interface;                                                             
               b)   providing said object with attributes that are                    
          relevant to the presentation of said object;                                
               c)   determinining from an input provided by way of said               
          desplayed object representation on said user interface if said              
          object is to be presented; and                                              
               d)   transforming said object into a displayable format                
          in accordance with said attributes and providing said                       
          transformed object to said presentation device if said object               
          is to be presented.                                                         
               The reference relied on by the examiner is:                            
          Norden-Paul et al. (Norden-Paul)   5,247,611           Sept. 21,            
          1993                                                                        
                                  (effective filing date Sept. 15,                   
          1989)                                                                       
               Claims 1 through 18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103               
          as being unpatentable over Norden-Paul.                                     
               Reference is made to the brief and the answer for the                  
          respective positions of the appellants and the examiner.                    
                                       OPINION                                        
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007