Appeal No. 96-2296 Application 08/091,894 to be separately patentable, it also falls with claim 1. 37 CFR § 1.192(c)(7). Conclusion The examiner’s decision to reject claims 1 to 4, 6 and 7 is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in con- nection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED IAN A. CALVERT ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT JAMES M. MEISTER ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007