Appeal No. 96-2298
Application 08/147,179
invention can
be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, a copy of
which appears in the appendix to the brief.
The following rejection is the sole rejection before us
for review.
Claims 1 through 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112,
second paragraph, as being indefinite.
The full text of the examiner's rejection and response to
the argument presented by appellants appears in the answer
(Paper No. 15), while the complete statement of appellants’
argument can be found in the brief (Paper No. 14).
OPINION
In reaching our conclusion on the indefiniteness issue
raised in this appeal, this panel of the board has carefully
considered appellants’ specification, drawing, and claims,2
In claim 7, line 1, “where in” should obviously be --wherein--.2
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007