THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte KEITH A. JONES, ANTHONY E. WINSTON,
M. STEPHEN LAJOIE and AMY L. JOSEPH
________________
Appeal No. 96-2324
Application No. 08/071,9631
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before WINTERS, DOWNEY and WARREN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal was taken from the examiner's decision
rejecting claims 39 through 42. Claim 38, which is the only
1Application for patent filed June 7, 1993. According
to appellants, this application is a division of Application
No. 07/883,422, filed May 12, 1992, now abandoned.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007