Appeal No. 96-2440
Application 08/099,289
The examiner relied on Benton to show the use of optical
fiber for transmission of video data signals (answer on page 5).
But Benton, as applied by the examiner, does not make up for any
of the deficiencies of Hunt as discussed above.
For the foregoing reasons, we do not sustain the rejection
of claims 1-4, 6-8, 10, 12-14, 16-18, 20, 22-25, 27-29, 31-34,
36-38 and 40-41 as being unpatentable over Hunt and Benton.
Conclusion
The rejection of claims 1-4, 6-8, 10, 12-14, 16-18, 20, 22-
25, 27-29, 31-34, 36-38 and 40-41 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Hunt and Benton is reversed.
REVERSED
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007