THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 37
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte KARL F. BARNETT,
DONALD P. MARRIOTT, CHRISTOPHER J. BARRETT
and
JOHN L. BREAUGH
_____________
Appeal No. 96-2455
Application 08/223,3231
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
FRANKFORT and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
1Application for patent filed April 5, 1994. According
to appellants, the application is a continuation of Applica-
tion 07/952,839, filed February 8, 1993, abandoned; which is a
continuation-in-part of Application 07/567,113, filed August
13, 1990, abandoned; which is a continuation-in-part of Appli-
cation 07/528,559, filed May 24, 1990, abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007