THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte GUERINO G. SACRIPANTE, MELVIN D. CROUCHER,
and STEPHAN V. DRAPPEL
_____________
Appeal No. 96-2574
Application 08/264,2641
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before: SOFOCLEOUS and GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judges,
and McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
Application for patent filed June 23, 1994. The application is said to be a1
division of application 08/144,964, now U.S. Patent 5,348,831. The real party in
interest is Xerox Corporation.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007