THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte RICHARD A. HALL, EDWARD T. SHEERAN, JR. and
MICHAEL S. SULLIVAN
_____________
Appeal No. 96-2608
Application 08/068,4981
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge and
FRANKFORT and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1, 4, 5, 8 and 11, and from the examiner's
refusal to allow claims 2 and 7 as amended subsequent to the
Application for patent filed May 27, 1993.1
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007