THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte MAGNUS DANEK
__________
Appeal No. 96-2670
Application 08/232,6771
___________
HEARD: June 9, 1998
___________
Before STAAB, McQUADE and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal was taken from the final rejection of claims 1 through 34. Upon
reconsideration, the examiner has withdrawn the rejections of claims 9 through 11 and
26 through 28. These claims, which have been indicated as containing allowable
subject matter, now stand objected to as depending from a rejected base claim (see
1Application for patent filed April 25, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007