Ex parte BOSTIC - Page 3




          Appeal No. 96-2817                                                          
          Application 08/082,549                                                      



                    (1) Circular body with periphery 16, having                       
                    cutting end (frustrum of a cone) 2, and an                        
                    end surface formed by E.                                          

                    (2) Terminal nose portion, 6.                                     
                    (3) Shank, 1.                                                     
                    (4) Axially extending flutes (end surface),                       
                    formed by E and D, see fig. 3. (apparently                        
                    J-shaped)                                                         
                    (5) Wall (radiused) having flat section                           
                    tangent to a curved section, 7 and adjacent                       
                    7, see fig. 3.                                                    
                    (6) Cutting edges, formed at 7 and 6 and adjacent F,              
                    defined by the intersection of said curved sections               
                    with said end surface E (answer, page 3).                         


                    Claims 7 and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as           
          being unpatentable over Jodock in view of Maier.  The examiner              
          relies upon Maier to provide the drill reamer of Jodock with                
          three flutes.                                                               


                    Reference is made to the examiner's answer (Paper                 
          No. 10, mailed January 22, 1996) for the examiner's full                    
          reasoning in support of the above-noted rejections.  Appellant's            
          arguments thereagainst are found in the brief (Paper No. 9,                 



                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007