THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ARNO WIRZ
_____________
Appeal No. 96-2850
Application 08/015,4001
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
COHEN and McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judges.
McCANDLISH, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s
rejection of claims 2, 4, 5 and 7. No other claims are pending
in the application.
1 Application for patent filed February 9, 1993. According to appellant, the
application is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/785,034, filed October 30, 1991.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007