THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MING-CHIANG LI
____________
Appeal No. 96-3023
Application No. 08/439,2841
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before URYNOWICZ, HAIRSTON and LEE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 20.
The disclosed invention relates to a radar system that
stores initially transmitted RF signals, and that uses the
1Application for patent filed May 11, 1995. According to
the appellant, the application is a continuation of
Application No. 08/018,388, filed February 17, 1993.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007