THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte EDWARD H. NORTRUP
____________
Appeal No. 96-3038
Application No. 08/372,0691
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before URYNOWICZ, HAIRSTON and CARMICHAEL, Administrative
Patent Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 5.
The disclosed invention relates to an arc tube.
1Application for patent filed January 12, 1995.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007