Ex parte INAMINE et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-3746                                                          
          Application 08/236,007                                                      


          Claim 1 is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and                 
          recites:                                                                    
               1.  An ink supply control device for a stencil printing                
          machine which controls the supply of printing ink to an ink                 
          reservoir formed in a printing drum according to a signal                   
          produced from an ink amount detecting device which produces a               
          first signal when the amount of ink stored in said ink reservoir            
          is detected to be greater than a prescribed level, and a second             
          signal when the amount of ink stored in said ink reservoir is               
          detected to be less than said prescribed level, comprising:                 
                    an arithmetic computing device for computing a relative           
          relationship between a time period during which said ink amount             
          detecting device produces said first signal and a time period               
          during which said ink amount detecting device produces said                 
          second signal;                                                              
                    an ink amount determining device for determining if the           
          amount of ink in said ink reservoir is less than said prescribed            
          level or not according to a result of said computing by said                
          arithmetic computing device; and                                            
                    an ink supply device for supplying printing ink to said           
          ink reservoir when an output from said ink amount determining               
          device indicates that the amount of ink in said ink reservoir is            
          less than said prescribed level.                                            
                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
                   The following references were relied on by the examiner           
          to support the final rejection:                                             
          Maeno et al. (Maeno)     4,796,054                Jan.  3, 1989             
          Barney                   5,103,728                Apr. 14, 1992             



                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
                   Claims 1-6, 9-28 and 30-33 stand rejected under 35                
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007